<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Apple Fighting iPhone Pirates?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:06:00 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/comment-page-1/#comment-262674</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/#comment-262674</guid>
		<description>How can anyone call these folks &quot;pirates&quot;? They&#039;re not pirating anything. Maybe violating terms of service, but not making unauthorized copies of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can anyone call these folks &#8220;pirates&#8221;? They&#8217;re not pirating anything. Maybe violating terms of service, but not making unauthorized copies of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/comment-page-1/#comment-262594</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/#comment-262594</guid>
		<description>Apple would only hurt itself by punishing its biggest enthusiasts. People pay $400 for the phone, they should be able to use it any way they want!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple would only hurt itself by punishing its biggest enthusiasts. People pay $400 for the phone, they should be able to use it any way they want!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. PoopyPants</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/comment-page-1/#comment-262575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. PoopyPants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2007/09/25/is-apple-fighting-iphone-pirates/#comment-262575</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; it is an unfortunate consequence connected to updating software&lt;/i&gt;

Unlocked phones are a consequence of having no SDK.  Not having an SDK is an unfortunate consequence of sleeping with the Devil, Ma Bell.  

Apple&#039;s choice to lock into a single carrier gives them a share of contract revenue, but makes Apple beholden to Ma Bell.  

Now we&#039;re seeing some of the consequences of that unfortunate choice.

It will be interesting to see how many iPhone hackers choose to forego Apple&#039;s update, to keep the plethora of 3rd-party applications intact on their phone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> it is an unfortunate consequence connected to updating software</i></p>
<p>Unlocked phones are a consequence of having no SDK.  Not having an SDK is an unfortunate consequence of sleeping with the Devil, Ma Bell.  </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s choice to lock into a single carrier gives them a share of contract revenue, but makes Apple beholden to Ma Bell.  </p>
<p>Now we&#8217;re seeing some of the consequences of that unfortunate choice.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how many iPhone hackers choose to forego Apple&#8217;s update, to keep the plethora of 3rd-party applications intact on their phone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
