<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mobile Gaming Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:33:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Calian</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-337741</link>
		<dc:creator>John Calian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/#comment-337741</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget about Movaya in your roundup! We have a bit of news ourselves (release of v2.0 of our PlugNPlay service). 

Though we certainly do not have the brand identity of i-play, glu or id, we  are positioning ourselves to help all mobile game publishers succeed off-deck, and currently we are promoting the fact that we are here to help the entire industry move forward, which means opening up distribution for game publishers, helping merchants with the technology they need to sell games off-deck, and raise the overall awareness of the mobile gaming industry in the eyes of consumers.

The companies mentioned above are in a tight spot right now in terms of game sales on-deck, and through conversations with them it is apparent that everyone has an off-deck strategy emerging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about Movaya in your roundup! We have a bit of news ourselves (release of v2.0 of our PlugNPlay service). </p>
<p>Though we certainly do not have the brand identity of i-play, glu or id, we  are positioning ourselves to help all mobile game publishers succeed off-deck, and currently we are promoting the fact that we are here to help the entire industry move forward, which means opening up distribution for game publishers, helping merchants with the technology they need to sell games off-deck, and raise the overall awareness of the mobile gaming industry in the eyes of consumers.</p>
<p>The companies mentioned above are in a tight spot right now in terms of game sales on-deck, and through conversations with them it is apparent that everyone has an off-deck strategy emerging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Starr</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/comment-page-1/#comment-336893</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Starr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/2007/11/17/mobile-gaming-roundup/#comment-336893</guid>
		<description>Hiya, John... now in addition to the bad taste you exhibited with the comment above, you&#039;ve taken to deleting comments from readers too huh?

Well, I&#039;ll just screen cap this one so if you delete it like you did the last one you&#039;ll look even more ludicrous.

Like I said before, MobileCrunch has reached a new low with your truly vile comment above.  No one wants to hear about your juvenile fantasies for bedding Angelina Jolie.

People read (or should I say they used to read) MobileCrunch for the analysis and breaking news.  Not puerile commentary and inane sexual innuendo.

As the founding editor of MobileCrunch I was genuinely proud of this blog.  Our readership was one that consisted of some of the most intelligent and influential people in the mobile community including many top bloggers, entrepreneurs and more than a couple venture capitalists.

I respected the complement these people were paying me by reading MobileCrunch and I did my best to always provide content that was worthy of such an audience.

When other occasional contributors made immature sexual remarks trying to sound like Engadget or Gizmodo I was quick to make it clear to Mike that this was NOT the sort of content our readers came for and it was not an acceptable addition to this blog.

My how things have changed.  Your Angelina remark above is a new low- and to be honest, I am embarrassed for you for having written it.  I have to wonder what value you think it adds, or whom among your readers would find that remark even the least bit amusing.

I don&#039;t even read MobileCrunch any longer and the only reason I was aware of your faux pas was because it so offended a friend of mine that he wrote me specifically to address it.

Clearly things must be slipping significantly there if this kind of tripe is actually making it onto the site these days.  I can&#039;t help but wonder what you were drinking when you wrote that last line, let alone what was going through your head when you actually posted it to the blog...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya, John&#8230; now in addition to the bad taste you exhibited with the comment above, you&#8217;ve taken to deleting comments from readers too huh?</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ll just screen cap this one so if you delete it like you did the last one you&#8217;ll look even more ludicrous.</p>
<p>Like I said before, MobileCrunch has reached a new low with your truly vile comment above.  No one wants to hear about your juvenile fantasies for bedding Angelina Jolie.</p>
<p>People read (or should I say they used to read) MobileCrunch for the analysis and breaking news.  Not puerile commentary and inane sexual innuendo.</p>
<p>As the founding editor of MobileCrunch I was genuinely proud of this blog.  Our readership was one that consisted of some of the most intelligent and influential people in the mobile community including many top bloggers, entrepreneurs and more than a couple venture capitalists.</p>
<p>I respected the complement these people were paying me by reading MobileCrunch and I did my best to always provide content that was worthy of such an audience.</p>
<p>When other occasional contributors made immature sexual remarks trying to sound like Engadget or Gizmodo I was quick to make it clear to Mike that this was NOT the sort of content our readers came for and it was not an acceptable addition to this blog.</p>
<p>My how things have changed.  Your Angelina remark above is a new low- and to be honest, I am embarrassed for you for having written it.  I have to wonder what value you think it adds, or whom among your readers would find that remark even the least bit amusing.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even read MobileCrunch any longer and the only reason I was aware of your faux pas was because it so offended a friend of mine that he wrote me specifically to address it.</p>
<p>Clearly things must be slipping significantly there if this kind of tripe is actually making it onto the site these days.  I can&#8217;t help but wonder what you were drinking when you wrote that last line, let alone what was going through your head when you actually posted it to the blog&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
