Comments on: Sprint: On the wrong SERO plan? Give us our phone back. http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/01/sprint-on-the-wrong-sero-plan-give-us-our-phone-back/ All About Mobile 2.0 Mon, 15 Mar 2010 16:11:11 +0000 hourly 1 By: Christopher Price http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/01/sprint-on-the-wrong-sero-plan-give-us-our-phone-back/comment-page-1/#comment-419718 Christopher Price Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:17:13 +0000 http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3296#comment-419718 Also, Sprint has gone on-record saying anyone can sign up for SERO... you don't need to know a Sprint employee. They confirmed that's just a marketing gimmick. And, Sprint has also released special emails allowing the public to sign up using the SERO web site, such as savings@sprint.com Also, Sprint has gone on-record saying anyone can sign up for SERO… you don’t need to know a Sprint employee. They confirmed that’s just a marketing gimmick.

And, Sprint has also released special emails allowing the public to sign up using the SERO web site, such as savings@sprint.com

]]> By: Kevin H http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/01/sprint-on-the-wrong-sero-plan-give-us-our-phone-back/comment-page-1/#comment-419717 Kevin H Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:22:19 +0000 http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3296#comment-419717 @1 SERO plans are for friends/family of Sprint employees, not just the employees themselves. Who's to say you aren't somehow indirectly friends/family of someone and just don't know it? @1 SERO plans are for friends/family of Sprint employees, not just the employees themselves. Who’s to say you aren’t somehow indirectly friends/family of someone and just don’t know it?

]]> By: jeff http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/01/sprint-on-the-wrong-sero-plan-give-us-our-phone-back/comment-page-1/#comment-419716 jeff Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:11:13 +0000 http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3296#comment-419716 Come on, if you are not a Sprint employee, but you impersonated one (in practice), then you don't think that's on the wrong side of the argument? Come on, if you are not a Sprint employee, but you impersonated one (in practice), then you don’t think that’s on the wrong side of the argument?

]]>