<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sprint launches new default mobile portal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/28/sprint-launches-new-default-mobile-portal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/28/sprint-launches-new-default-mobile-portal/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:43:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Raef</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/07/28/sprint-launches-new-default-mobile-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-420305</link>
		<dc:creator>Raef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 21:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=3430#comment-420305</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m interested to know how why people might think altering content based on past usage could be a privacy violation. Surely websites do that now for customizing advertising, don&#039;t they? 

I&#039;m all for protecting privacy but I (have to) accept Google tracking my every click using their search engine. Is there any difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m interested to know how why people might think altering content based on past usage could be a privacy violation. Surely websites do that now for customizing advertising, don&#8217;t they? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m all for protecting privacy but I (have to) accept Google tracking my every click using their search engine. Is there any difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
