Comments on: Google’s mobile geolocation gets a small accuracy tuneup http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/16/googles-mobile-geolocation-gets-a-small-accuracy-tuneup/ All About Mobile 2.0 Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:30:50 -0600 hourly 1 By: Greg Kumparak http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/16/googles-mobile-geolocation-gets-a-small-accuracy-tuneup/comment-page-1/#comment-421235 Greg Kumparak Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:58:55 +0000 http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=4063#comment-421235 I'll change it for the sake of clarification ("cell base station" vs "cell phone"), but it makes perfect sense. Your position is determined in relation to that of the cells (as in "cell base station", the thing which contains the radio tower) nearest you. I'll change it to "tower", as it's a bit less ambiguous. Thanks. I’ll change it for the sake of clarification (”cell base station” vs “cell phone”), but it makes perfect sense. Your position is determined in relation to that of the cells (as in “cell base station”, the thing which contains the radio tower) nearest you.

I’ll change it to “tower”, as it’s a bit less ambiguous. Thanks.

]]> By: ChrisK http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/16/googles-mobile-geolocation-gets-a-small-accuracy-tuneup/comment-page-1/#comment-421233 ChrisK Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:21:01 +0000 http://mobilecrunch.com/?p=4063#comment-421233 "cell based GPS"? Wazzat? Please, the popular press is confused enough, can't you guys strive for some accuracy in your buzzwords? “cell based GPS”? Wazzat? Please, the popular press is confused enough, can’t you guys strive for some accuracy in your buzzwords?

]]>