<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple blocks MailWrangler application for no good reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:37:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Apple dismounts from high horse, approves 3rd Party Browsers</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-429423</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple dismounts from high horse, approves 3rd Party Browsers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-429423</guid>
		<description>[...] wares, they were turned away for offering features too similar to Apple&#8217;s own offerings, or  &#8220;duplicate functionality&#8221;. The outcry was instantaneous and deafening; it&#8217;s one thing to have pride in your work, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wares, they were turned away for offering features too similar to Apple&#8217;s own offerings, or  &#8220;duplicate functionality&#8221;. The outcry was instantaneous and deafening; it&#8217;s one thing to have pride in your work, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did Apple Just Change a Major App Store Policy?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-429422</link>
		<dc:creator>Did Apple Just Change a Major App Store Policy?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-429422</guid>
		<description>[...] wares, they were turned away for offering features too similar to Apple&#8217;s own offerings, or  &#8220;duplicate functionality&#8221;. The outcry was instantaneous and deafening; it&#8217;s one thing to have pride in your work, but [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wares, they were turned away for offering features too similar to Apple&#8217;s own offerings, or  &#8220;duplicate functionality&#8221;. The outcry was instantaneous and deafening; it&#8217;s one thing to have pride in your work, but [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Observations: September 2008 Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421861</link>
		<dc:creator>McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Business Observations: September 2008 Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421861</guid>
		<description>[...] Apple blocks MailWrangler application for no good reason [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Apple blocks MailWrangler application for no good reason [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421696</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421696</guid>
		<description>This is pathetic.

The more Apple does this, the more they are making the case for Windows Mobile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is pathetic.</p>
<p>The more Apple does this, the more they are making the case for Windows Mobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin H</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 00:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421614</guid>
		<description>This sounds like one more reason for me to not get an iPhone and instead go with android, even though as a whole package, it probably won&#039;t be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like one more reason for me to not get an iPhone and instead go with android, even though as a whole package, it probably won&#8217;t be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IL Padrone</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421602</link>
		<dc:creator>IL Padrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421602</guid>
		<description>Once again you are correct sir!!  Apple has always been slick like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again you are correct sir!!  Apple has always been slick like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421600</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421600</guid>
		<description>I suspect they would accept once the account editing is added.  It may not seem to be logical, but I&#039;ve seen stranger things.  The same reason that computers do not run companies (yet).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect they would accept once the account editing is added.  It may not seem to be logical, but I&#8217;ve seen stranger things.  The same reason that computers do not run companies (yet).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421596</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421596</guid>
		<description>Just do a Jailbreak and you can install your own applications. Don&#039;t know though if this application is going to be released for cydia or installler...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just do a Jailbreak and you can install your own applications. Don&#8217;t know though if this application is going to be released for cydia or installler&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Broadway</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421595</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Broadway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421595</guid>
		<description>Let someone else repair their design flaws? Don&#039;t be silly. They save them up, fix them themselves once they&#039;ve sold a couple of million handsets and then release a new version to rapturous applause from the hoards of mindless fanboys (do I sound cynical?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let someone else repair their design flaws? Don&#8217;t be silly. They save them up, fix them themselves once they&#8217;ve sold a couple of million handsets and then release a new version to rapturous applause from the hoards of mindless fanboys (do I sound cynical?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421592</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421592</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one of the reasons that keeps me from getting an Apple products. Apple is getting to be too much of a control freak. With a *smart*phone  that doesn&#039;t let you attach more than one picture at a time they should at least let somebody else repair their design flaws. So a theoretically interesting products becomes less and less interesting to the more evolved community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one of the reasons that keeps me from getting an Apple products. Apple is getting to be too much of a control freak. With a *smart*phone  that doesn&#8217;t let you attach more than one picture at a time they should at least let somebody else repair their design flaws. So a theoretically interesting products becomes less and less interesting to the more evolved community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay@konsulted.com</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421591</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay@konsulted.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 18:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421591</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t they distribute their app on their own (enterprise)? Do they need Apple&#039;s approval for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t they distribute their app on their own (enterprise)? Do they need Apple&#8217;s approval for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ajay</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421589</link>
		<dc:creator>ajay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 17:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421589</guid>
		<description>so weak...

well, as frustrating as this is, it&#039;s not sustainable. apple will eventually have to compete with the more open platforms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so weak&#8230;</p>
<p>well, as frustrating as this is, it&#8217;s not sustainable. apple will eventually have to compete with the more open platforms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timheuer</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421588</link>
		<dc:creator>timheuer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421588</guid>
		<description>MailWrangler isn&#039;t the only one, just the latest -- it&#039;s getting ridiculous.  Duplicate functionality?  helllloooo: http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2008/09/22/apple-appstore-restricts-user-choice.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MailWrangler isn&#8217;t the only one, just the latest &#8212; it&#8217;s getting ridiculous.  Duplicate functionality?  helllloooo: <a href="http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2008/09/22/apple-appstore-restricts-user-choice.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2008/09/22/apple-appstore-restricts-user-choice.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/22/apple-blocks-mailwrangler-for-no-good-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-421587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4163#comment-421587</guid>
		<description>I would really like to have this application. I&#039;ve already replaced my Mail app shortcut with a shortcut to gmail in Safari, but it&#039;s annoying having to deal with logging in periodically. And having it as only one Safari page among many means the shortcut doesn&#039;t always behave the way I&#039;d like.

I appreciate that Apple regulates the app store somewhat, but this feels like a case of stifling innovation. And the reason sounds hollow, as I&#039;m more likely to be confused by the nuanced differentiation among a dozen calculators than I am between this app and Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would really like to have this application. I&#8217;ve already replaced my Mail app shortcut with a shortcut to gmail in Safari, but it&#8217;s annoying having to deal with logging in periodically. And having it as only one Safari page among many means the shortcut doesn&#8217;t always behave the way I&#8217;d like.</p>
<p>I appreciate that Apple regulates the app store somewhat, but this feels like a case of stifling innovation. And the reason sounds hollow, as I&#8217;m more likely to be confused by the nuanced differentiation among a dozen calculators than I am between this app and Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
