<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Sony Ericsson Xperia handset probably won&#8217;t run Android</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:33:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UTDNEWS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sony Ericsson “Rachel” is the XPERIA X3, Specs leaked</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-445489</link>
		<dc:creator>UTDNEWS &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sony Ericsson “Rachel” is the XPERIA X3, Specs leaked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-445489</guid>
		<description>[...] real name is XPERIA X3. Back in September, Sony Ericsson CTO said they had no plans to bring Android devices to the market. Oh, how quickly things change when you&#8217;re bleeding hundreds of millions per [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] real name is XPERIA X3. Back in September, Sony Ericsson CTO said they had no plans to bring Android devices to the market. Oh, how quickly things change when you&#8217;re bleeding hundreds of millions per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sony Ericsson “Rachel” is the XPERIA X3, Specs leaked &#124; Wilsonbroadcast</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-445430</link>
		<dc:creator>Sony Ericsson “Rachel” is the XPERIA X3, Specs leaked &#124; Wilsonbroadcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-445430</guid>
		<description>[...] real name is XPERIA X3. Back in September, Sony Ericsson CTO said they had no plans to bring Android devices to the market. Oh, how quickly things change when you&#8217;re bleeding hundreds of millions per [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] real name is XPERIA X3. Back in September, Sony Ericsson CTO said they had no plans to bring Android devices to the market. Oh, how quickly things change when you&#8217;re bleeding hundreds of millions per [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyocera joins the Android-powered handset club &#124; TellyComm</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-423419</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyocera joins the Android-powered handset club &#124; TellyComm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-423419</guid>
		<description>[...] in the handset world are tinkering with the idea of bringing an Android device to the market (Well, except for Sony Ericsson. Or Apple.) Joining the confirmed list today is Kyocera, with an announcement that they are working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the handset world are tinkering with the idea of bringing an Android device to the market (Well, except for Sony Ericsson. Or Apple.) Joining the confirmed list today is Kyocera, with an announcement that they are working [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyocera joins in on the Android phone dev</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-423336</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyocera joins in on the Android phone dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-423336</guid>
		<description>[...] in the handset world are tinkering with the idea of bringing an Android device to the market (Well, except for Sony Ericsson. Or Apple.) Joining the confirmed list today is Kyocera, with an announcement that they are working [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the handset world are tinkering with the idea of bringing an Android device to the market (Well, except for Sony Ericsson. Or Apple.) Joining the confirmed list today is Kyocera, with an announcement that they are working [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-422038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-422038</guid>
		<description>Why do you automatically say that cellphones need Flash and Silverlight? I think that as long as cellphones do not have these proprietary technologies, websites are going to be that much likely to use them for their content. I would like to see ogg theora/vorbis integrated into web browsers, including mobiles, so that we have completely open technologies for multimedia being the norm. I think these technologies would be easier to port to a wide variety of cell phones and mobiles, because support is already possible with extra software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you automatically say that cellphones need Flash and Silverlight? I think that as long as cellphones do not have these proprietary technologies, websites are going to be that much likely to use them for their content. I would like to see ogg theora/vorbis integrated into web browsers, including mobiles, so that we have completely open technologies for multimedia being the norm. I think these technologies would be easier to port to a wide variety of cell phones and mobiles, because support is already possible with extra software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Next Sony Ericsson Xperia handset probably wonâ€™t run Android &#124; tech gadget update</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421945</link>
		<dc:creator>Next Sony Ericsson Xperia handset probably wonâ€™t run Android &#124; tech gadget update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 05:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421945</guid>
		<description>[...] Via Mobilecrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via Mobilecrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christexaport</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421865</link>
		<dc:creator>christexaport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421865</guid>
		<description>Jason, can I ask you a question? You instantly compared the G1 Android platform to the iPhone. Besides a touchscreen, how are there any similarities to these devices? I see more differences than similarities.

I don&#039;t know how tech savvy you are, but the reason true techies laugh at the iPhone and Mac culture in general is the lack of product knowledge by its consumers. iPhone users are spoon-fed technology, heavily hampered by its overseers. The iPhone is a nice featurephone with an SDK. The G1 is a multitasking desktop replacement more similar to Windows XP/Vista than the &quot;runs one app at a time&quot; iPhone. The hardware is better, the camera is better, the developer environment is better, the proposed audio/video codec support will obviously be better than Mac&#039;s strict rules, and its backbone is Linux, and is open source. 

For the neophyte, the iPhone is a decent introduction. But once you become more advanced, multitasking and openness become more important than cute graphics. They didn&#039;t make Vista better, and it doesn&#039;t allow Apple to outdo Android. This device should be compared to the Nokia Nseries, Windows Mobile devices, and Blackberries, which are laptop replacements. Anyone ditching their laptops for iPhones??

Not all propaganda is believable. Learn the facts. The iPhone has no features the Nokia N95 8gb lacks, yet the Nokia N95 has multiple features the iPhone lacks. The same in this instance. Android is a computer OS. The iPhone, by definition, isn&#039;t even a smartphone, with no multitasking. Its SDK is a nice smart feature, but no one was fooled but those silly enough to buy Macs when PC use better, more up to date hardware.

When users can use the entire web, with Flash and Silverlight, instead of static images like Opera Mini, as the iPhone does, and desktop browser-based apps fully work as they do on the desktop, like they do on today&#039;s top smartphones, then your statement will have more validity. So far, you&#039;ve shown no ways the iPhone is superior to any smartphone running Symbian, Android, or even WinMo and RIM.

Chris aka christexaport
www.symbian-freak.com
www.android-freak.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason, can I ask you a question? You instantly compared the G1 Android platform to the iPhone. Besides a touchscreen, how are there any similarities to these devices? I see more differences than similarities.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know how tech savvy you are, but the reason true techies laugh at the iPhone and Mac culture in general is the lack of product knowledge by its consumers. iPhone users are spoon-fed technology, heavily hampered by its overseers. The iPhone is a nice featurephone with an SDK. The G1 is a multitasking desktop replacement more similar to Windows XP/Vista than the &#8220;runs one app at a time&#8221; iPhone. The hardware is better, the camera is better, the developer environment is better, the proposed audio/video codec support will obviously be better than Mac&#8217;s strict rules, and its backbone is Linux, and is open source. </p>
<p>For the neophyte, the iPhone is a decent introduction. But once you become more advanced, multitasking and openness become more important than cute graphics. They didn&#8217;t make Vista better, and it doesn&#8217;t allow Apple to outdo Android. This device should be compared to the Nokia Nseries, Windows Mobile devices, and Blackberries, which are laptop replacements. Anyone ditching their laptops for iPhones??</p>
<p>Not all propaganda is believable. Learn the facts. The iPhone has no features the Nokia N95 8gb lacks, yet the Nokia N95 has multiple features the iPhone lacks. The same in this instance. Android is a computer OS. The iPhone, by definition, isn&#8217;t even a smartphone, with no multitasking. Its SDK is a nice smart feature, but no one was fooled but those silly enough to buy Macs when PC use better, more up to date hardware.</p>
<p>When users can use the entire web, with Flash and Silverlight, instead of static images like Opera Mini, as the iPhone does, and desktop browser-based apps fully work as they do on the desktop, like they do on today&#8217;s top smartphones, then your statement will have more validity. So far, you&#8217;ve shown no ways the iPhone is superior to any smartphone running Symbian, Android, or even WinMo and RIM.</p>
<p>Chris aka christexaport<br />
<a href="http://www.symbian-freak.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.symbian-freak.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.android-freak.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.android-freak.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ro11z</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421855</link>
		<dc:creator>Ro11z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421855</guid>
		<description>Dont mean a thing as PR guys say a LOT of BS to throw you off the sent.

would be great to see the Android OS on that gorgus hardware tho
dont think it will happen till SE join the OHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont mean a thing as PR guys say a LOT of BS to throw you off the sent.</p>
<p>would be great to see the Android OS on that gorgus hardware tho<br />
dont think it will happen till SE join the OHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 05:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421835</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t look as good as the iPhone. I think I&#039;ll pass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t look as good as the iPhone. I think I&#8217;ll pass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riles</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421812</link>
		<dc:creator>Riles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421812</guid>
		<description>I imagine there are going to be a lot of holdouts until Android really catches fire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine there are going to be a lot of holdouts until Android really catches fire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jordans</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/09/24/next-sony-ericsson-xperia-handset-probably-wont-run-android/comment-page-1/#comment-421800</link>
		<dc:creator>Jordans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 23:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=4202#comment-421800</guid>
		<description>Sony comes out with some pretty nice software them self so I don&#039;t see such a bad thing about it. Than also i do see Android becoming a better software in the long run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sony comes out with some pretty nice software them self so I don&#8217;t see such a bad thing about it. Than also i do see Android becoming a better software in the long run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
