<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QiGi 6 offers Windows Mobile 6.1 or Android &#8211; but not both</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/01/qigi-6-offers-windows-mobile-61-or-android-but-not-both/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/01/qigi-6-offers-windows-mobile-61-or-android-but-not-both/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:01:54 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Kumparak</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/01/qigi-6-offers-windows-mobile-61-or-android-but-not-both/comment-page-1/#comment-425974</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Kumparak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=5936#comment-425974</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right. I went in with low expectations, so anything beyond &quot;It&#039;s pretty much an etch-a-sketch with an Android logo on the back&quot; would have surprised me. While the 624mhz CPU is relatively impressive for an obscure manufacturer, the rest is fairly lame. Edited that blurp out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right. I went in with low expectations, so anything beyond &#8220;It&#8217;s pretty much an etch-a-sketch with an Android logo on the back&#8221; would have surprised me. While the 624mhz CPU is relatively impressive for an obscure manufacturer, the rest is fairly lame. Edited that blurp out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/01/qigi-6-offers-windows-mobile-61-or-android-but-not-both/comment-page-1/#comment-425973</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=5936#comment-425973</guid>
		<description>Why do you say it has good specs? it doesn&#039;t have good specs at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do you say it has good specs? it doesn&#8217;t have good specs at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
