<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the big deal about touch screens anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:33:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Igor Faletski</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-428661</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Faletski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 23:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7012#comment-428661</guid>
		<description>One of the best features of a touchscreen is the fact that it provides random access to any element of a website, when browsing on mobile.

It&#039;s like magnetic tape drive vs. RAM - no more need to navigate elements one-by-one with arrow keys, or scrolling to the destination pixel.

The experience and efficiency gains are significant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the best features of a touchscreen is the fact that it provides random access to any element of a website, when browsing on mobile.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s like magnetic tape drive vs. RAM &#8211; no more need to navigate elements one-by-one with arrow keys, or scrolling to the destination pixel.</p>
<p>The experience and efficiency gains are significant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aranea</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-428613</link>
		<dc:creator>Aranea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7012#comment-428613</guid>
		<description>I like the touchscreen. It&#039;s very convenient when surfing the web, or reading a long email. I think it&#039;s easier to use than a trackball. besides I use g1, which has the qwerty keyboard and the trackball as well. I rarely use trackball other than for copy/pasting. For that trackball is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the touchscreen. It&#8217;s very convenient when surfing the web, or reading a long email. I think it&#8217;s easier to use than a trackball. besides I use g1, which has the qwerty keyboard and the trackball as well. I rarely use trackball other than for copy/pasting. For that trackball is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjsnyc</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-428589</link>
		<dc:creator>pjsnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7012#comment-428589</guid>
		<description>This article was fun to read...but speak for yourself.  Is the author trying to think &#039;outside of the box&#039;?  Cute, but it ain&#039;t workin - the article assumes too many things. 

Who ever said the on screen keyboard or other dialogues on screen were supposed to feel like &#039;buttons&#039;? 

Oh, and I love this one - &#039;Touchless screen&#039;?  Puhleeze, pretty lame attempt - it&#039;s a friggin screen that you touch!  What else would you call it?  As a person with a background in philosophy, that one&#039;s pretty easy to see through.  Either that, or your standards are set way too high.

I&#039;ll agree that the touch screen craze might be getting a little out of hand...but innovation is exactly what this global economy needs right now (so why not let touchscreens be one of its avenues?).  And for the record, I do not have an iPhone (WM user here).  I do have an iPod touch however, and I must say that in the end (and especially to the end user), snappy interfaces that are intuitive will always win out.

I mean if you want to talk about how our consciousness interacts with the surrounding environment, here&#039;s a mind freak - How many times have you used a gadget - even one with  buttons - and it wasn&#039;t snappy at the wrong time and you wanted to throw the damn thing?  &quot;OH NO the fundamental stimulus/response system has been thrown out of whack because I pressed the talk button and it hung there for a long time making me feel like an idiot staring at the screen for 15 straight seconds, oh wait I&#039;m connected!&quot;  - I&#039;m sure an honest look around this forum (and in the mirror) will explain itself - especially since more and more demographics are making technology more prevalent in their lives. If you wanna keep it exclusive (and that&#039;s the tone I gather from your article), fine, but unfortunately for you - its a pipe dream.  Besides, at least in our lifetime, there will always be an alternative device with buttons.  Happy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was fun to read&#8230;but speak for yourself.  Is the author trying to think &#8216;outside of the box&#8217;?  Cute, but it ain&#8217;t workin &#8211; the article assumes too many things. </p>
<p>Who ever said the on screen keyboard or other dialogues on screen were supposed to feel like &#8216;buttons&#8217;? </p>
<p>Oh, and I love this one &#8211; &#8216;Touchless screen&#8217;?  Puhleeze, pretty lame attempt &#8211; it&#8217;s a friggin screen that you touch!  What else would you call it?  As a person with a background in philosophy, that one&#8217;s pretty easy to see through.  Either that, or your standards are set way too high.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll agree that the touch screen craze might be getting a little out of hand&#8230;but innovation is exactly what this global economy needs right now (so why not let touchscreens be one of its avenues?).  And for the record, I do not have an iPhone (WM user here).  I do have an iPod touch however, and I must say that in the end (and especially to the end user), snappy interfaces that are intuitive will always win out.</p>
<p>I mean if you want to talk about how our consciousness interacts with the surrounding environment, here&#8217;s a mind freak &#8211; How many times have you used a gadget &#8211; even one with  buttons &#8211; and it wasn&#8217;t snappy at the wrong time and you wanted to throw the damn thing?  &#8220;OH NO the fundamental stimulus/response system has been thrown out of whack because I pressed the talk button and it hung there for a long time making me feel like an idiot staring at the screen for 15 straight seconds, oh wait I&#8217;m connected!&#8221;  &#8211; I&#8217;m sure an honest look around this forum (and in the mirror) will explain itself &#8211; especially since more and more demographics are making technology more prevalent in their lives. If you wanna keep it exclusive (and that&#8217;s the tone I gather from your article), fine, but unfortunately for you &#8211; its a pipe dream.  Besides, at least in our lifetime, there will always be an alternative device with buttons.  Happy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2008/12/30/whats-the-big-deal-about-touch-screens-anyway/comment-page-1/#comment-428439</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7012#comment-428439</guid>
		<description>A huge chunk of the iPhone crowd have never used a smartphone. There&#039;s not a single dumbphone I&#039;ve used that includes cut-and-paste. It&#039;s hard to miss something that you&#039;ve never had before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A huge chunk of the iPhone crowd have never used a smartphone. There&#8217;s not a single dumbphone I&#8217;ve used that includes cut-and-paste. It&#8217;s hard to miss something that you&#8217;ve never had before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
