<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rumor: T-Mobile working with Danger on 3G Sidekick?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:33:33 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Ha</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/comment-page-1/#comment-430233</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Ha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7911#comment-430233</guid>
		<description>MS would be stupid to switch from the Danger OS and they&#039;d lose millions of users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS would be stupid to switch from the Danger OS and they&#8217;d lose millions of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s this about a Sidekick LX 2009?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/comment-page-1/#comment-430232</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s this about a Sidekick LX 2009?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7911#comment-430232</guid>
		<description>[...] isn&#8217;t this a kick in the pants. As TmoNews was reporting earlier that a 3G Sidekick could be in the works, Ed over at Hiptop3 just sent this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] isn&#8217;t this a kick in the pants. As TmoNews was reporting earlier that a 3G Sidekick could be in the works, Ed over at Hiptop3 just sent this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/comment-page-1/#comment-430225</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7911#comment-430225</guid>
		<description>so here is a question... what OS will it be running now that MS owns Danger?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so here is a question&#8230; what OS will it be running now that MS owns Danger?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/01/28/rumor-t-mobile-working-with-danger-on-3g-sidekick/comment-page-1/#comment-430223</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=7911#comment-430223</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s pretty pathetic that 3G even has to be mentioned as a feature in this day and age. It should be expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty pathetic that 3G even has to be mentioned as a feature in this day and age. It should be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
