<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:14:14 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. &#124; Mobil Teknoloji Haberleri</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-450897</link>
		<dc:creator>Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. &#124; Mobil Teknoloji Haberleri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-450897</guid>
		<description>[...] mobilecrunch Share this on FriendFeedShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Tweet This!Share this on TechnoratiShare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mobilecrunch Share this on FriendFeedShare this on del.icio.usDigg this!Tweet This!Share this on TechnoratiShare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Bell Dogma: February-March 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-435644</link>
		<dc:creator>McGuire&#8217;s Law &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Big Bell Dogma: February-March 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-435644</guid>
		<description>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MacTalk Podcast - Episode 62 - 20th Anniversary Remastered Limited Edition - MacTalk Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431969</link>
		<dc:creator>MacTalk Podcast - Episode 62 - 20th Anniversary Remastered Limited Edition - MacTalk Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431969</guid>
		<description>[...] No MultiTouch on Android - Apple owns yo ass. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] No MultiTouch on Android &#8211; Apple owns yo ass. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ironyjk's me2DAY</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431586</link>
		<dc:creator>ironyjk's me2DAY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431586</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;iron의 생각...&lt;/strong&gt;

Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>iron의 생각&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links de la semana 3 &#124; El Blog de Gaston Bercun</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431492</link>
		<dc:creator>Links de la semana 3 &#124; El Blog de Gaston Bercun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431492</guid>
		<description>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so, las patentes tiene sus lados buenos y sus lados malos. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so, las patentes tiene sus lados buenos y sus lados malos. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BOBS #5 Twitter veut facturer ses services, Sun JavaFX Mobile, Ghislain Lambert, &#171; Mguiraud&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431421</link>
		<dc:creator>BOBS #5 Twitter veut facturer ses services, Sun JavaFX Mobile, Ghislain Lambert, &#171; Mguiraud&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431421</guid>
		<description>[...] Vrac :Le modèle de maturité du Cloud Computing Apple demande à Google de ne pas utiliser le multitouch, et il accepte. Itunes va diffuser des films par flux sans stockage local, Réseaux sociaux : 17 sites [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Vrac :Le modèle de maturité du Cloud Computing Apple demande à Google de ne pas utiliser le multitouch, et il accepte. Itunes va diffuser des films par flux sans stockage local, Réseaux sociaux : 17 sites [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Googles G1 ohne Multitouch, weil Apple das so will&#8230; &#124; BlogWave.de</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431394</link>
		<dc:creator>Googles G1 ohne Multitouch, weil Apple das so will&#8230; &#124; BlogWave.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431394</guid>
		<description>[...] (via) Verwandte Beiträge:Apple MobileMe auch Buggy...Microsoft baut App für Apple...eBay hat einen neuen Chef weil XING einen neuen Chef hat...iPhone Patent - die Lizenz zum Geld drucken... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via) Verwandte Beiträge:Apple MobileMe auch Buggy&#8230;Microsoft baut App für Apple&#8230;eBay hat einen neuen Chef weil XING einen neuen Chef hat&#8230;iPhone Patent &#8211; die Lizenz zum Geld drucken&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juan</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431333</link>
		<dc:creator>Juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431333</guid>
		<description>Maybe because of processor speed, hardware costs, etc?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe because of processor speed, hardware costs, etc?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xGPS Brings Turn-by-Turn Directions to iPhone Via Jailbreak &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431319</link>
		<dc:creator>xGPS Brings Turn-by-Turn Directions to iPhone Via Jailbreak &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431319</guid>
		<description>[...] on multi-touch (crunchgear.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (ajax-blog.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com)Google Latitude coming to other devices, iPhone included (engadget.com)Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on multi-touch (crunchgear.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (ajax-blog.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com)Google Latitude coming to other devices, iPhone included (engadget.com)Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On Apple, Android, and 3.5mm Headset Jacks &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431318</link>
		<dc:creator>On Apple, Android, and 3.5mm Headset Jacks &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431318</guid>
		<description>[...] scared Google out of using multitouch, 3.5mm jacks, batteries, displays, love (engadget.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com)Apple, Google, and Palm (John Gruber/Daring Fireball) (techmeme.com)Cupertino, My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] scared Google out of using multitouch, 3.5mm jacks, batteries, displays, love (engadget.com)Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com)Apple, Google, and Palm (John Gruber/Daring Fireball) (techmeme.com)Cupertino, My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ahmed Salem</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ahmed Salem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431303</guid>
		<description>Try to analyzes this, Apple sued Mircosoft in previous times on the using the idea of multiple graphical representations of running applications that is knows in today as windows. Nowadays news about suing Palm on using the multi-touch in its new phone Pre. Meanwhile they never stop talking about creativity and being open to the community. I don&#039;t believe it is very true to make a patent for the ideas. the first one who ever made a cafe can not sue Starbucks for this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to analyzes this, Apple sued Mircosoft in previous times on the using the idea of multiple graphical representations of running applications that is knows in today as windows. Nowadays news about suing Palm on using the multi-touch in its new phone Pre. Meanwhile they never stop talking about creativity and being open to the community. I don&#8217;t believe it is very true to make a patent for the ideas. the first one who ever made a cafe can not sue Starbucks for this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickard</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431301</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431301</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get this. In Sweden you are unable to get a patent if the object for patent has been shown to the public (in any form). And I first saw multi touch in the early 90s. How can common knowledge be patented? It beats me....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get this. In Sweden you are unable to get a patent if the object for patent has been shown to the public (in any form). And I first saw multi touch in the early 90s. How can common knowledge be patented? It beats me&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501760832">Joe Dawson</fb:name></title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431299</link>
		<dc:creator><fb:name linked="false" useyou="false" uid="501760832">Joe Dawson</fb:name></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431299</guid>
		<description>If Apple were a car manufacturer we would all be driving Reliant Robin clones :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Apple were a car manufacturer we would all be driving Reliant Robin clones :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jongalt</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431298</link>
		<dc:creator>jongalt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431298</guid>
		<description>I heard it privately from someone senior on the Google&#039;s mobile team three months ago that they can&#039;t implement multitouch on their phones, because apple has the multitouch patents locked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard it privately from someone senior on the Google&#8217;s mobile team three months ago that they can&#8217;t implement multitouch on their phones, because apple has the multitouch patents locked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431288</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431288</guid>
		<description>I agree, that Google will wait until there are other players.  They don&#039;t need any issues or lawsuits over a non core offering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, that Google will wait until there are other players.  They don&#8217;t need any issues or lawsuits over a non core offering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth Mac - Lord of the Apple Empire &#187; Even Google Bows to Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431286</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth Mac - Lord of the Apple Empire &#187; Even Google Bows to Apple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431286</guid>
		<description>[...] And for the doubters, you only have to read the news.  Apple Owns Multi Touch  As reported by MobileCrunch Google left multi touch capability out of the Android-based G1 because of a simple request from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And for the doubters, you only have to read the news.  Apple Owns Multi Touch  As reported by MobileCrunch Google left multi touch capability out of the Android-based G1 because of a simple request from the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431283</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431283</guid>
		<description>Things only become obvious when someone shows you how to do them.  If the multitouch interface for a mobile phone is obvious, why did it take 10 years for it to appear in a mobile phone product?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things only become obvious when someone shows you how to do them.  If the multitouch interface for a mobile phone is obvious, why did it take 10 years for it to appear in a mobile phone product?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tostada-man</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431281</link>
		<dc:creator>Tostada-man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431281</guid>
		<description>But....what about Aria&#039;s boobs?  You don&#039;t CARE about boobs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;.what about Aria&#8217;s boobs?  You don&#8217;t CARE about boobs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trading Tactics</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431280</link>
		<dc:creator>Trading Tactics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 02:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431280</guid>
		<description>jajaja funny but its true, all the problem is the patent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jajaja funny but its true, all the problem is the patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Apple: “Don’t Use Multi-Touch on Android!” Google: “Okay…” &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431274</link>
		<dc:creator>Apple: “Don’t Use Multi-Touch on Android!” Google: “Okay…” &#8212; iPhone Tricks, Tips and Hacks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431274</guid>
		<description>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why no multitouch on the G1? Because Apple said so. (mobilecrunch.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melvin</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431272</link>
		<dc:creator>Melvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431272</guid>
		<description>This whole patent on multitouch is a little ackward. Such things would never be patented in Europe, and there&#039;s a good reason for that.

If Apple had patented backwards walking... Michael Jackson shouldda watch his back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole patent on multitouch is a little ackward. Such things would never be patented in Europe, and there&#8217;s a good reason for that.</p>
<p>If Apple had patented backwards walking&#8230; Michael Jackson shouldda watch his back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Antena &#187; Archivos del Blog &#187; Apple ♥ Google (2a. Parte)</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431271</link>
		<dc:creator>La Antena &#187; Archivos del Blog &#187; Apple ♥ Google (2a. Parte)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431271</guid>
		<description>[...] despu&#233;s del lanzamiento) la incorporaci&#243;n del multitouch en el G1. Rumores dicen que claramente es un acuerdo entre las dos compa&#241;&#237;as, por que el multitouch se puede instalar en el G1 de manera no oficial desde hace unas [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] despu&eacute;s del lanzamiento) la incorporaci&oacute;n del multitouch en el G1. Rumores dicen que claramente es un acuerdo entre las dos compa&ntilde;&iacute;as, por que el multitouch se puede instalar en el G1 de manera no oficial desde hace unas [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431269</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431269</guid>
		<description>Android is software and hardware in essence. Perhaps its not implemented so that all these other platforms can retain a common subset of functionality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android is software and hardware in essence. Perhaps its not implemented so that all these other platforms can retain a common subset of functionality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tryps</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431261</link>
		<dc:creator>Tryps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431261</guid>
		<description>Whatever. I hope Google&#039;s working on Google MindReader. I&#039;d love to not use fingers or speech altogether.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever. I hope Google&#8217;s working on Google MindReader. I&#8217;d love to not use fingers or speech altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Krugeri</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/02/10/why-no-multitouch-on-the-g1-because-apple-said-so/comment-page-1/#comment-431260</link>
		<dc:creator>Krugeri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=8437#comment-431260</guid>
		<description>Absolutely agreed, Tostada-man. I am glad I am a worker drone mearly clipping away to make &quot;The Man&quot; richer than I will ever be.

Goodness forbid that I might be a creative type working hard to create some new, even if seemingly obvious, next cool thing. Writers like this and the commentors here have an stunningly visceral dislike of patent holders keeping cool (but clearly unique) features to themselves.

If Apple holds the patents reported I would hope they would license it. If they don&#039;t... it is their prerogative (and to their company&#039;s and investors&#039; benefit) and rooting for companies to defy them just so you can have the feature elsewhere is kinda lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely agreed, Tostada-man. I am glad I am a worker drone mearly clipping away to make &#8220;The Man&#8221; richer than I will ever be.</p>
<p>Goodness forbid that I might be a creative type working hard to create some new, even if seemingly obvious, next cool thing. Writers like this and the commentors here have an stunningly visceral dislike of patent holders keeping cool (but clearly unique) features to themselves.</p>
<p>If Apple holds the patents reported I would hope they would license it. If they don&#8217;t&#8230; it is their prerogative (and to their company&#8217;s and investors&#8217; benefit) and rooting for companies to defy them just so you can have the feature elsewhere is kinda lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
