Know something we should know? Send us a note at our tips line. We respect anonymity. »
Court sides with FCC’s “porting” decision, rejects Verizon’s (whiny) arguments
  • 2 Comments
by Jeremy Kessel on February 12, 2009

verizonvfcc

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has upheld (pdf) a FCC decision finding that Verizon’s use of proprietary information of rival companies for marketing purposes violates federal law.

To make more sense out of this holding, we’ve gotta back up a few steps. When a customer informs her carrier that she plans to switch operators, the consumer’s current company puts out a notification to assist in transferring (aka porting) her existing number over to a new service. Apparently, Verizon had been offering customers sweetened deals to stay with the Nation’s #2 telecommunications company once it learned that the particular customer was planning to defect.

After learning about these shady dealings last year, Comcast, Time Warner, and Bright House Networks called upon the FCC to investigate Verizon’s actions, arguing that they violated the U.S. Telecommunications Act’s restrictions on the use of rivals’ proprietary information for marketing purposes. The FCC agreed, issuing a decision stating that the intention of the federal law was to ensure the losing carrier played a neutral role in transferring a customer’s phone number. Verizon then moved to challenge the FCC decision, arguing that it put Verizon at an unfair disadvantage.

Then, two days ago, the Court of Appeals sided with the FCC, holding that the regulatory body’s interpretation of the particular section (222(b) to be exact) of the Telecommunications Act was reasonable and rejected Verizon’s challenge. This ruling will effectively prevent all communications companies from actively trying to persuade customers to reconsider their pending move to a new service. Too bad it won’t stop these same companies from providing spotty coverage and terrible customer support…

[via Reuters]

Comments rss icon

  • I really don’t get this. Here in the UK, this is standard operating procedure. You ring your provider and say “I’m off” and then they bend over backwards to keep you to stay – new phones, more minutes, lower bills, etc.

    I know people who ring up with no intention of leaving just to get a better deal.

    What’s so wrong with this practice? If you told any other business that you were leaving for pastures new, wouldn’t you expect them to try and keep your custom. Wouldn’t you?

    But then, the US pay for incoming calls and text. We’re truly two countries separated by a common language and bizarre phone tariffs :-)

    [Disclaimer: I work for Vodafone who own a large chunk of Verizon. This comment is my personal view and does not represent my employers etc.]

  • Explain again how this is decision is good for consumers?

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

Trackback URL