<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Android Users Are Stickier Than iPhone Users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/</link>
	<description>All About Mobile 2.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:30:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kevin Villagomez</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-444086</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin Villagomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-444086</guid>
		<description>This is a good point. I never thought about it this way. I would add that Android users think they have a phone while iPhone/iPod Touch users think they have a gaming device that can make phone/skype calls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point. I never thought about it this way. I would add that Android users think they have a phone while iPhone/iPod Touch users think they have a gaming device that can make phone/skype calls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Armand</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-444038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Armand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-444038</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t get me wrong.

I like the the concept of Android, it&#039;s a good concept, besides the fact that it&#039;s influenced by Google&#039;s decision.

I tried Android once, before I move to iPhone, and I haven&#039;t moved back, because I&#039;m not a Java developer. 

Development on Android is not as easy as iPhone, and I&#039;m not talking about which one has the best technology or software development tools, it&#039;s more on ease of use and development.

I&#039;m not sure how do you build OpenGL apps on Android, or how do you use the existing C library on Android, and I don&#039;t know if Android has Core Animation like iPhone ?

Other than that, I still believe Apple has made the right decision by choosing Objective-C as its main programming language for their frameworks. They don&#039;t need their apps to be cross-platform (no need for Virtual Machine, and they have their own market for their hardware), and they use the most convenient OOP I have ever learned so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong.</p>
<p>I like the the concept of Android, it&#8217;s a good concept, besides the fact that it&#8217;s influenced by Google&#8217;s decision.</p>
<p>I tried Android once, before I move to iPhone, and I haven&#8217;t moved back, because I&#8217;m not a Java developer. </p>
<p>Development on Android is not as easy as iPhone, and I&#8217;m not talking about which one has the best technology or software development tools, it&#8217;s more on ease of use and development.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure how do you build OpenGL apps on Android, or how do you use the existing C library on Android, and I don&#8217;t know if Android has Core Animation like iPhone ?</p>
<p>Other than that, I still believe Apple has made the right decision by choosing Objective-C as its main programming language for their frameworks. They don&#8217;t need their apps to be cross-platform (no need for Virtual Machine, and they have their own market for their hardware), and they use the most convenient OOP I have ever learned so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-444037</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-444037</guid>
		<description>Android SDK is very nice developer environment as well, at least I prefer it over iPhone SDK. The great thing about Android is it is very easy to take existing &quot;services&quot; and provide a great mashup that is more than a sum of its parts. Something Apple promised to deliver in OpenDoc many years ago, but never delivered. Android is a dream target platform in that regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Android SDK is very nice developer environment as well, at least I prefer it over iPhone SDK. The great thing about Android is it is very easy to take existing &#8220;services&#8221; and provide a great mashup that is more than a sum of its parts. Something Apple promised to deliver in OpenDoc many years ago, but never delivered. Android is a dream target platform in that regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pavel</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-444034</link>
		<dc:creator>Pavel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-444034</guid>
		<description>@A.T. (&quot;Java on Symbian is technically from J2ME kind.&quot;) 
Well, not really. There are two kinds of &quot;Java&quot; runtimes on Symbian. One is J2ME compatible and the other is &quot;PersonalJava&quot;, which in fact is Java 1.1+AWT

While it is a very popular platform as it is now in almost all Nokia phones, as a runtime for applications it will quickly loose ground to iPhone and Android IMO. I would ignore it as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@A.T. (&#8221;Java on Symbian is technically from J2ME kind.&#8221;)<br />
Well, not really. There are two kinds of &#8220;Java&#8221; runtimes on Symbian. One is J2ME compatible and the other is &#8220;PersonalJava&#8221;, which in fact is Java 1.1+AWT</p>
<p>While it is a very popular platform as it is now in almost all Nokia phones, as a runtime for applications it will quickly loose ground to iPhone and Android IMO. I would ignore it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Armand</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443992</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Armand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443992</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right Cameron.

One thing that irritates me is when I encourage people to enrich and expand the unofficial iPhone development community, which has produced several useful software in the jailbreaked iPhone community (The effort by Jay Freeman a.k.a Saurik, etc.), they think it&#039;s an unprofessional activity which they consider as &quot;amateur hacking&quot;.

I guess iPhone users and Apple themselves are not into those device-enhancement, and collaborative development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right Cameron.</p>
<p>One thing that irritates me is when I encourage people to enrich and expand the unofficial iPhone development community, which has produced several useful software in the jailbreaked iPhone community (The effort by Jay Freeman a.k.a Saurik, etc.), they think it&#8217;s an unprofessional activity which they consider as &#8220;amateur hacking&#8221;.</p>
<p>I guess iPhone users and Apple themselves are not into those device-enhancement, and collaborative development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Judd</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443990</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Judd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443990</guid>
		<description>Personally, I believe the main reason why Android Apps stay longer than iPhone apps is because many android apps are there to enhance, improve or replace some of the functions already on the phone.  Things like widgets, something that is used on my home screen always, my messaging app which replaces my regular messaging, weather app, birthday app, all these are just sitting on my phone working.

Where on the iPhone, the app just adds another service, like a new game, or the ability to make fart noised.  You cant do away with the standard iphone apps (as far as I am aware).

Just my 2p!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I believe the main reason why Android Apps stay longer than iPhone apps is because many android apps are there to enhance, improve or replace some of the functions already on the phone.  Things like widgets, something that is used on my home screen always, my messaging app which replaces my regular messaging, weather app, birthday app, all these are just sitting on my phone working.</p>
<p>Where on the iPhone, the app just adds another service, like a new game, or the ability to make fart noised.  You cant do away with the standard iphone apps (as far as I am aware).</p>
<p>Just my 2p!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443878</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443878</guid>
		<description>was cut short... 

finishing above ..

Point is the quality of the apps will vary according with the users that are using it. If you got a different kind of user, a younger type, the quality of the app for him will be different from one that is older that can be looking to functionality other than looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was cut short&#8230; </p>
<p>finishing above ..</p>
<p>Point is the quality of the apps will vary according with the users that are using it. If you got a different kind of user, a younger type, the quality of the app for him will be different from one that is older that can be looking to functionality other than looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443877</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443877</guid>
		<description>The quality of the apps depends on the point of view. Take the Skype app for instance. On Android you can get it for free, you can use other applications while it is open, so whenever a user sent you a msg or a call it will switch back to the Skype and you can use the 3G network for it without needing to hack it. As far as I know, for iPhone, if you are using the Skype and move to another app it will disconnect and if you decide to use it on a 3G network or any other network other Wifi, you will need to hack to get it (based on a friend&#039;s experience - I don&#039;t have an iPhone - mean no offense).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quality of the apps depends on the point of view. Take the Skype app for instance. On Android you can get it for free, you can use other applications while it is open, so whenever a user sent you a msg or a call it will switch back to the Skype and you can use the 3G network for it without needing to hack it. As far as I know, for iPhone, if you are using the Skype and move to another app it will disconnect and if you decide to use it on a 3G network or any other network other Wifi, you will need to hack to get it (based on a friend&#8217;s experience &#8211; I don&#8217;t have an iPhone &#8211; mean no offense).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Notational</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443867</link>
		<dc:creator>El Notational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443867</guid>
		<description>Anyone who makes the claim that the available Android apps are higher quality is deluded.  I have both kinds of phones, including the new GS iPhone and the Google Ion Android that they gave out at IO.  The best Android apps are ports of iPhone apps.  I haven&#039;t seen a lick of innovative development on Android.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who makes the claim that the available Android apps are higher quality is deluded.  I have both kinds of phones, including the new GS iPhone and the Google Ion Android that they gave out at IO.  The best Android apps are ports of iPhone apps.  I haven&#8217;t seen a lick of innovative development on Android.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Thackeray</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443852</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Thackeray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443852</guid>
		<description>His point seems pretty obvious to me. 

Symbian = Rest of World. iPhone = USA. The US car industry focused on SUVs and totally failed to compete globally like the Japanese and European car builders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His point seems pretty obvious to me. </p>
<p>Symbian = Rest of World. iPhone = USA. The US car industry focused on SUVs and totally failed to compete globally like the Japanese and European car builders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443763</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443763</guid>
		<description>Naaaw... come on... if someone is going to get irked for your opinion, and feel they need to flame you as a response, it just proves your point that iPhone users are more immature than Android users. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naaaw&#8230; come on&#8230; if someone is going to get irked for your opinion, and feel they need to flame you as a response, it just proves your point that iPhone users are more immature than Android users. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443762</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443762</guid>
		<description>Fart apps are the kind of apps that work well on a non-multitaskign system. You load them up, you quit them. No one gets hurt.

Now, I tried Fring to be ableto IM. Or Facebook to keep in touch. On my android, I get notifications when I use these apps. On my iPod, I get nothing if the app is not open.

I think people but fart apps because they&#039;re looking for anything to do with their phone, because most everything barely works. ;)

Having both, I use my apps on my android because they work better for me. Multitasking is important! 

Of course, everyone generalizes using a single example. At least, I do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fart apps are the kind of apps that work well on a non-multitaskign system. You load them up, you quit them. No one gets hurt.</p>
<p>Now, I tried Fring to be ableto IM. Or Facebook to keep in touch. On my android, I get notifications when I use these apps. On my iPod, I get nothing if the app is not open.</p>
<p>I think people but fart apps because they&#8217;re looking for anything to do with their phone, because most everything barely works. ;)</p>
<p>Having both, I use my apps on my android because they work better for me. Multitasking is important! </p>
<p>Of course, everyone generalizes using a single example. At least, I do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Armand</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443758</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Armand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443758</guid>
		<description>I think all of you have forgot this important point:

The Cocoa and iPhone SDK is pleasant, so developers like it.

The only reason I don&#039;t go to other mobile device development is because I don&#039;t like J2ME or C++, and their unpleasant IDE / API.

The iPhone is keep on improving at its young age, and if other platforms are still ugly as I see it, I can see a reason of more developers are switching to iPhone, when they got the chance.

Less developers on other platforms, less apps will be produced, so ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all of you have forgot this important point:</p>
<p>The Cocoa and iPhone SDK is pleasant, so developers like it.</p>
<p>The only reason I don&#8217;t go to other mobile device development is because I don&#8217;t like J2ME or C++, and their unpleasant IDE / API.</p>
<p>The iPhone is keep on improving at its young age, and if other platforms are still ugly as I see it, I can see a reason of more developers are switching to iPhone, when they got the chance.</p>
<p>Less developers on other platforms, less apps will be produced, so ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terance</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443757</link>
		<dc:creator>Terance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443757</guid>
		<description>I would say that the reason Android apps get used more often are because Android can multitask.

No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that the reason Android apps get used more often are because Android can multitask.</p>
<p>No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cristiano</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443756</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443756</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Q Dub. The iPhone users are mostly young people or hypes. Android users are mostly people that needs the phone in a daily basis as a portable PC (yours truly). If you want to add another statistic on this is the number of users that hack the phone to get the apps. I bet the iPhone on this case would win easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Q Dub. The iPhone users are mostly young people or hypes. Android users are mostly people that needs the phone in a daily basis as a portable PC (yours truly). If you want to add another statistic on this is the number of users that hack the phone to get the apps. I bet the iPhone on this case would win easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fun watching the chaos Solstice Schmolstice Edition</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443733</link>
		<dc:creator>Fun watching the chaos Solstice Schmolstice Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:17:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443733</guid>
		<description>NURSE! Dude wants a PRN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NURSE! Dude wants a PRN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LorenW</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443726</link>
		<dc:creator>LorenW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 03:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443726</guid>
		<description>Everyone knows its Microshaft... not M$.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone knows its Microshaft&#8230; not M$.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripple</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443695</link>
		<dc:creator>tripple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443695</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking for phones that enable us to send free SMS like this site do: http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking for phones that enable us to send free SMS like this site do: <a href="http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms" rel="nofollow">http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripple</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443694</link>
		<dc:creator>tripple</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443694</guid>
		<description>I’m looking for features on mobile that will enable us send free SMS like this site do: http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m looking for features on mobile that will enable us send free SMS like this site do: <a href="http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms" rel="nofollow">http://tinurl.mobi/fullfreesms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: endmp</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443691</link>
		<dc:creator>endmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443691</guid>
		<description>I am a g1 user... and I will tell you exactly why I use my apps more often... like someone mention earlier it is because we choose quality apps... but its not entirely due to the app itself... its because we have been trained to do so... with every g1 owner within the week we all come up with the same realization... this thing has shitty internal memory that only let&#039;s us download.. a certain number of apps before we nerf our phones... so we choose the what we need not what we want... with iphone you choose what you want.. then forget you have it... so it kinda explains that&#039;s how they got 1 billion downloads... they designed it for numerous downloading of applications... but not multitasking... sounds pretty moronic right?  What&#039;s even more moronic is that people continually pay for variations of the same app and never use them... one day... when they develop android to run off of the sd without root... u will see a better android system with an exponential increase in the number of downloads like iphone.  Android will always continue to evolve faster than any other smartphone os... and its simply because .... Android is exponential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a g1 user&#8230; and I will tell you exactly why I use my apps more often&#8230; like someone mention earlier it is because we choose quality apps&#8230; but its not entirely due to the app itself&#8230; its because we have been trained to do so&#8230; with every g1 owner within the week we all come up with the same realization&#8230; this thing has shitty internal memory that only let&#8217;s us download.. a certain number of apps before we nerf our phones&#8230; so we choose the what we need not what we want&#8230; with iphone you choose what you want.. then forget you have it&#8230; so it kinda explains that&#8217;s how they got 1 billion downloads&#8230; they designed it for numerous downloading of applications&#8230; but not multitasking&#8230; sounds pretty moronic right?  What&#8217;s even more moronic is that people continually pay for variations of the same app and never use them&#8230; one day&#8230; when they develop android to run off of the sd without root&#8230; u will see a better android system with an exponential increase in the number of downloads like iphone.  Android will always continue to evolve faster than any other smartphone os&#8230; and its simply because &#8230;. Android is exponential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: led panel</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443683</link>
		<dc:creator>led panel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443683</guid>
		<description>Iphone still the hottest ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iphone still the hottest ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443681</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443681</guid>
		<description>John:

I totally agree with the points you&#039;re making - but what&#039;s up with the M$ stuff?  It was probably clever back in 85 when someone first used it - but homie it&#039;s 2009 and well, saying it&#039;s been played out ad nauseum would be the understatement of the year ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John:</p>
<p>I totally agree with the points you&#8217;re making &#8211; but what&#8217;s up with the M$ stuff?  It was probably clever back in 85 when someone first used it &#8211; but homie it&#8217;s 2009 and well, saying it&#8217;s been played out ad nauseum would be the understatement of the year ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Q dub</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443675</link>
		<dc:creator>Q dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443675</guid>
		<description>Think there&#039;s a really simple explanation for this: iPhone apps are skewed towards games, which characteristically have lower retention.  Not exactly a indicative of the quality of the app library nor of the loyalty of the user base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think there&#8217;s a really simple explanation for this: iPhone apps are skewed towards games, which characteristically have lower retention.  Not exactly a indicative of the quality of the app library nor of the loyalty of the user base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443674</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443674</guid>
		<description>You can develop applications for Android in Java and Android phones can run J2ME apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can develop applications for Android in Java and Android phones can run J2ME apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kubricklove</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2009/06/19/android-users-are-stickier-than-iphone-users/comment-page-1/#comment-443673</link>
		<dc:creator>Kubricklove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilecrunch.com/?p=14887#comment-443673</guid>
		<description>Could you explain a little more clearly how the iPhone relates to US automakers. I don&#039;t Quite understand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you explain a little more clearly how the iPhone relates to US automakers. I don&#8217;t Quite understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
