Review: AT&T Navigator app for iPhone
  • 13 Comments
by Scott Merrill on December 21, 2009

att-navigatorI’ve been using the AT&T Navigator app for iPhone for a couple of months now. This is a free app, but it requires a $10/month subscription from AT&T (or $70 for an annual subscription). I’m not going to belabor the GPS functions too much in this review: it’s almost the year 2010, and the global positioning system has been used to provide turn-by-turn directions for long enough now that any GPS device or application being reviewed should do that basic job. Instead, I’m going to examine how useful a GPS function is on your mobile phone, talk about some of what’s nice (and not-so-nice) about the AT&T Navigator, and look at the value proposition of a $10/month subscription in light of Google’s free turn-by-turn driving directions on the Verizon Droid.

The Not-So-Good
The first thing to know about the Navigator application is that it suffers from the iPhone’s inability to support “background apps”. That is, if you want turn-by-turn directions, you need to leave the Navigator app running on your phone. You can’t pop over to check your email, or even take a call or reply to an SMS, without interrupting the navigation. When you’re on a long stretch of highway, that’s not a big deal; but it can be a little frustrating if you’re sitting in the passenger seat and trying to multitask on your fancy smartphone. (You should never multitask on your fancy smartphone if you’re driving the car!)

The good news, though, is that iPod functionality is well integrated into the app. With the press of an on-screen button, you can have access to your playlists, media navigation controls, and more. The music will be muted when the Navigator app needs to speak to you, which minimizes some of the concerns about the always-on nature of the app.

The second thing to know about the Navigator app is that it’s frequently just a little slow. This is a result of being just a little weak in terms of positioning accuracy. It consistently reports me as being anywhere from 50 to 500 feet away from where I actually am. Again, while driving down the highway this isn’t a big deal; but when navigating city streets it’s mighty frustrating to be instructed to turn left onto the street you just passed.

Also, it’s really slow to start up. This is frustrating when you wind up popping in and out of the app — whether because you’re making a call, or using another app. You need to wait patiently for the app to start before you can use it. If you’re en route, it usually remembers this, and asks you if you want to continue navigating to your destination. On a couple of occasions, though, exiting the app while en route resulted in a lost route. When I started the app again, I was presented with the home screen. It seems that there’s a minimum threshold for how long a route must be active before the app saves it. Put another way: don’t start navigating somewhere and then immediately close out of the app.

Finally, the app is really fond of U-turns. If I miss a turn, it will as often as not suggest that I make a U-turn. Maybe that’s okay in most parts of the world, but in Columbus, OH U-turns are illegal except at a few specifically designated intersections. If I don’t make a U-turn, I send the application into a fit as it tries to re-route me with every turn I make. I don’t mind being told to make a U-turn: I know I’m not supposed to do it, so I don’t. Instead, I make a couple of right or left turns to effectively get pointed back in the other direction. The Navigator app has no idea of my intentions, of course, and merrily recomputes a new route for me with every turn.

The Good
That sounds like a lot of negatives, and to be fair they’re legitimate concerns. But in all honesty, I’ve really enjoyed using this application. It’s been my experience that the routing is really good. I’ve never gotten lost using it, and it’s never given me a braindead route that causes problems. Indeed, on a Thanksgiving roadtrip to Cartersville, GA, it provided perfect directions to my sister-in-law’s house in a new development, while my mother-in-law got lost following the instructions from Google Maps.

Real-time traffic reports are included in the subscription fee. That, too, helped at Thanksgiving, so that I could know how far traffic would be bumper-to-bumper as we exited the city.

Probably the biggest selling point for the Navigator app, though, is the use of a server-based routing mechanism. Instead of loading all the map data onto your handset, the map data lives with Telenav. This means that updates can be made in real time, in reaction to important events. For example, the San Francisco-Oakland Bay bridge was closed over the Labor Day weekend this year. If you were using a traditional GPS device, it likely would have been ignorant of this fact, and happily told you to take the bridge to get out of town, leaving you stuck in traffic. Telenav routed around the bridge, since they knew it would be closed, thereby saving their customers a lot of frustration and wasted time.

A recent update to Navigator added full landscape support, which is a nice feature to have. I didn’t have any problems using the application strictly in portrait mode, but landscape is certainly handy sometimes! Here’s a video in which you can see it, and the iPod controls, in action:

So, how does AT&T Navigator, at $10/month, stack up against Google’s mapping service on the Verizon Droid? Alas, I’m not able to answer that question, yet, since I don’t have a Droid. I did ask both AT&T and Telenav, though, how they think things compare.

Here’s a quick comment from Todd Witkemper, from Telenav:

In general, here are a few differentiators that TeleNav products provide that Google Navigation does not have:

• Proven map data that is consistently updated (I’ve read multiple reviews of Google Navigation where the reviewer received incorrect routing)
• Online preplanning/account management
• A real person’s voice for majority of audio commands (vs. text to speech computerized voice)
• Proactive traffic alerts with one-click rerouting (you don’t have to change views to see traffic updates)
• Real-time gas prices, weather, WiFi hot spot listings, commute alerts and movie listings/ticket purchasing (movie info on AT&T Navigator 1.8)
• Route style options like avoiding HOV lanes and toll roads
• Location-sharing

TeleNav also supports more than 500 devices in multiple countries.

Seth Bloom at AT&T adds:

AT&T Navigator remains one of our most popular apps to date. We have a great, open and ongoing dialogue with our Navigator customers and feel confident in our track record of making enhancements based on real-time customer feedback.

More choice is always great for consumers, but we’re confident with this app and with our interactive dialogue with our customers that is helping ensure they get a premier voice and visual turn-by-turn GPS experience.

Bottom Line: if you don’t yet own a dedicated GPS, and you’re tired of the shortcomings of the iPhone’s Maps app, the Navigator app is a good option. Be sure to pay the yearly fee, rather than month-by-month.

Comments rss icon

  • $70/year was already too expensive for software-only nav before Google got into the game. Now that Google’s free nav is out, it’s downright insane.

    Google’s POV database is nearly unlimited–it’s freakin Google after all. Telenav can’t possibly hope to keep up here.

    Google already has 3D satellite view and Street View right in the nav, and it’s only going to get more features like this.

    You can “edit” locations on Google maps. I’ve already moved my house slightly to make it a bit more correct.

    I sure hope iPhone gets a similar built-in nav in June (preferably by Google), or I might have to jump ship. That $70 per year will almost pay for a subsidize phone.

  • There is no comparison. Google is “free” and equal to the competition in terms of features.

    Note that Google Navigation is not 100% “free”. To use Google Navigation you must exchange a certain amount of privacy.

    • oh noe!!!! Google knows that I use my phone to find Thai Food and to get directions to my friday night holiday party. oh noe!!!! how dare they profile me like this!!

  • One thing to correct: Google Navigation is not for Droid only. It’s available for any Android phone running 1.6 or above in US.

    IMHOif you’re going to pay $70 it’s better to buy a stand alone GPS. IF you’re in the middle of nowhere you don’t want to pay for roaming too.

  • I wrote a review of a free GPS application for the iPhone called Waze. You can read it here: http://www.1goodreason.com/blog/2009/12/07/entering-the-iphone-gps-business/
    It offers everything feature wise, except gas stations, & wifi. The thing I like about Waze is that it is crowdsourcing the map and traffic data from the users. If Waze takes off, its database will kill Google, and TeleNav because of the crowd sourcing. I’m not connected with Waze in any way.
    Thanks for the excellent review article.
    Chris

  • who makes this app? is it the same person that makes the sprint navigation app? (which if you’re on sprint, there’s no per month charge if you have one of the unlimited data plans)
    http://blog.telenav.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/sprint-navigation-telenav_04-500×333.jpg

  • from the sound of this at&t still blows, no offense to all you iphone users but damn my palm pre navigates for free and its very accurate. so why would anyone want to pay a monthly charge for this…um just saying!!

  • look like my gps in my blackberry…..

  • I’ve been using the Televav app on my G1 for about 6 months and it is definitely superior to Google Maps- more precisely, it’s superior to Google Maps on the TMO network. TMO’s 3G coverage is excellent in the metro-Atlanta area as long as you stay within the boundaries of I285 (the loop). If you venture more than a few miles away from I285 in most any direction, the coverage begins to degrade. The coverage backs down to E and also has a tendency to “suddenly” drop out altogether. That spells trouble for any app that requires a data connection to operate, including Google Maps. Many times I was left holding a “brick” at the exact moment when I most needed the GPS.

    Enter Telenav. The latest version (5.5 for my phone) does not need a data connection. When the data signal drops, Telenav informs me and then simply changes from map view to turn by turn arrow view. When the data signal reappears Telenav informs me and switches back to map view.

    The bottom line for TMO customers is that due to the sketchy data coverage, Google Maps is a non-starter.

  • I dislike Sprint but at the same time I don’t have to pay for basic Nav for the exact same app (with the exception of the Sprint color scheme). There is a premium version but the free version does a lot.

    There’s also Where.

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

Short URL